Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1

    Duke 2010-11 opener: Nov. 14

    Still another month before the 2010-11 schedule is announced, but we learned today that Duke will open the season on Nov. 14 against Princeton in Cameron in the opener of the CBE Classic.

    Duke's second game will come two days later (Nov. 16) against Miami of Ohio, also in Cameron.

    The CBE is a semi-tournament in that no matter what happens in those two games, Duke will move on to Kansas City for two games Nov. 22-23 for a four-team tournament against Kansas State, Gonzaga and Marquette.

    Not sure what the semifinal matchups are ... and it's also probable that Duke will play at least one game between the Miami game on the 16th and the CBE semiifnal on the 22nd.

    But the opening matchups were announced today. In addition to the two Duke games, Kansas State will play James Madison and Presbyterian in Manhattan (Kan.); Gonzaga will play IUPUI and San Diego State in Spokane; Marquette will play Bucknell and UW-Green Bay in Milwaukee.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Columbus, OH

    Tickets

    Does anyone know if the IronDukes will have tickets for the Kansas City games or do I just need to purchase them through Ticketmaster?

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Olympic Fan View Post

    The CBE is a semi-tournament in that no matter what happens in those two games, Duke will move on to Kansas City for two games Nov. 22-23 for a four-team tournament against Kansas State, Gonzaga and Marquette.

    Not sure what the semifinal matchups are ... and it's also probable that Duke will play at least one game between the Miami game on the 16th and the CBE semiifnal on the 22nd.

    But the opening matchups were announced today. In addition to the two Duke games, Kansas State will play James Madison and Presbyterian in Manhattan (Kan.); Gonzaga will play IUPUI and San Diego State in Spokane; Marquette will play Bucknell and UW-Green Bay in Milwaukee.
    Have i mentioned how much I despise this? This "Tourny" is just a joke that just tries to get the big money through big teams regardless of results. What's the point? There's no integrity to having the smaller teams at all, really.

    If it wanted to call itself a tourny, the CBE should have 4 great teams and a bunch of eh teams, but winner moves on. That at least would make sense. Alas, it's not. And we play in this joke of a "tourny".

    (Not to say that the hosts shouldn't all win, but if that's the case, why shoudn't winner move on? Ugh.)
    <devildeac> anyone playing drinking games by now?
    7:49:36<Wander> drink every qb run?
    7:49:38<loran16> umm, drink every time asack rushes?
    7:49:38<wolfybeard> @devildeac: drink when Asack runs a keeper
    7:49:39 PM<CB&B> any time zack runs, drink

    Carolina Delenda Est

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Quote Originally Posted by loran16 View Post
    Have i mentioned how much I despise this? This "Tourny" is just a joke that just tries to get the big money through big teams regardless of results. What's the point? There's no integrity to having the smaller teams at all, really.

    If it wanted to call itself a tourny, the CBE should have 4 great teams and a bunch of eh teams, but winner moves on. That at least would make sense. Alas, it's not. And we play in this joke of a "tourny".

    (Not to say that the hosts shouldn't all win, but if that's the case, why shoudn't winner move on? Ugh.)
    I agree that a tourney should have the winners move on and not have the 4 host schools pre-determined to advance. Iowa lost both opening round games in the CBE tourney last year at home to Texas-San Antonio and Duquesne, but still moved on to KC.

    This year the only host school that has a "loseable" game in its first two rounds is Gonzaga. I think San Diego St could give them a good game.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    Quote Originally Posted by Olympic Fan View Post
    Still another month before the 2010-11 schedule is announced, but we learned today that Duke will open the season on Nov. 14 against Princeton in Cameron in the opener of the CBE Classic.

    Duke's second game will come two days later (Nov. 16) against Miami of Ohio, also in Cameron.

    The CBE is a semi-tournament in that no matter what happens in those two games, Duke will move on to Kansas City for two games Nov. 22-23 for a four-team tournament against Kansas State, Gonzaga and Marquette.

    Not sure what the semifinal matchups are ... and it's also probable that Duke will play at least one game between the Miami game on the 16th and the CBE semiifnal on the 22nd.

    But the opening matchups were announced today. In addition to the two Duke games, Kansas State will play James Madison and Presbyterian in Manhattan (Kan.); Gonzaga will play IUPUI and San Diego State in Spokane; Marquette will play Bucknell and UW-Green Bay in Milwaukee.
    Say it ain't so; over 5 more months until the season's opening games? I guess only 4 more months until CTC and then exhibition games. That's a lot of cinder block and starting line-up discussions.
    “Those two kids, they’re champions,” Krzyzewski said of his senior leaders. “They’re trying to teach the other kids how to become that, and it’s a long road to become that.”

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Olympic Fan View Post
    Duke will move on to Kansas City for two games Nov. 22-23 for a four-team tournament against Kansas State, Gonzaga and Marquette.
    Hey DinK!! Have you got enough clean towels for all of us to come visit?

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by loran16 View Post
    Have i mentioned how much I despise this? This "Tourny" is just a joke that just tries to get the big money through big teams regardless of results. What's the point? There's no integrity to having the smaller teams at all, really.

    If it wanted to call itself a tourny, the CBE should have 4 great teams and a bunch of eh teams, but winner moves on. That at least would make sense. Alas, it's not. And we play in this joke of a "tourny".

    (Not to say that the hosts shouldn't all win, but if that's the case, why shoudn't winner move on? Ugh.)
    Agree, should not use the word tournament to discribe this "event" or "showcase".

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Does anyone know when they'll be hanging the banners(s)? Will it be at the first game?

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by K>Roy View Post
    Does anyone know when they'll be hanging the banners(s)? Will it be at the first game?
    They've already hung the Final Four 2010 (check my latest blog post for a pic) and the Final AP #1 banners.

    The actual National Title Banner will be unfurled at CTC.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    20 Minutes From The Heaven That Is Cameron Indoor
    Quote Originally Posted by oldnavy View Post
    Agree, should not use the word tournament to discribe this "event" or "showcase".
    If memory serves, this is the "Gardner-Webb" rule. Not sure if it was the CBE or not, but Gardner-Webb upset Kentucky at Kentucky a few years back and made it to the semi-finals.

    Last year the heels played in the CBE and were placed in the semi-finals no matter the outcome of their first 2 games.

    It's stupid. It is not a tournament unless only winners advance. This is a slap in the face to the teams that are not allowed to advance.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    California
    Quote Originally Posted by loran16 View Post
    If it wanted to call itself a tourny, the CBE should have 4 great teams and a bunch of eh teams, but winner moves on. That at least would make sense. Alas, it's not. And we play in this joke of a "tourny".
    Maybe that's why it's not called a tournament.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by El_Diablo View Post
    Maybe that's why it's not called a tournament.
    Right, it's called a Classic.

    http://www.gazellegroup.com/events/cbe/index_main.htm

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    San Francisco
    Quote Originally Posted by airowe View Post
    Also, as a big fan of the Princeton basketball program, the little schools relish the chance to play against the top dogs, no matter how much the odds are stacked against them. I'm glad Duke is back to playing Princeton again as it provides me with at least one chance to see the Tigers on TV each season.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by COYS View Post
    Also, as a big fan of the Princeton basketball program, the little schools relish the chance to play against the top dogs, no matter how much the odds are stacked against them. I'm glad Duke is back to playing Princeton again as it provides me with at least one chance to see the Tigers on TV each season.
    I, too, am glad to see Duke playing Princeton. I recall many fun Princeton games. Pete Carril was always entertaining and his teams tough to beat. We will see what Sydney Johnson can do with the Tigers when the come into Cameron.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    San Francisco
    Quote Originally Posted by Indoor66 View Post
    I, too, am glad to see Duke playing Princeton. I recall many fun Princeton games. Pete Carril was always entertaining and his teams tough to beat. We will see what Sydney Johnson can do with the Tigers when the come into Cameron.
    Johnson definitely has the program going in the right direction again after the disasterous years with He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named at the helm. I do not think the tigers have a real chance to win. Duke just has too many weapons and will force Princeton to play at a fast pace. Still, I hope they make it enough of a game to keep it interesting.

  16. #16

    small schools

    Quote Originally Posted by Boozer View Post
    If memory serves, this is the "Gardner-Webb" rule. Not sure if it was the CBE or not, but Gardner-Webb upset Kentucky at Kentucky a few years back and made it to the semi-finals.

    Last year the heels played in the CBE and were placed in the semi-finals no matter the outcome of their first 2 games.

    It's stupid. It is not a tournament unless only winners advance. This is a slap in the face to the teams that are not allowed to advance.
    To be fair, the small schools are taken care of. Although a Princeton and Miami won't get to advance to the semifinals, no matter what, they WILL get to play four games. The first/second round patsies from Durham will play each other and will play first/second round patsies from the other sites.

    Some of them will get to host games.

    While they can't win the event, they get (1) at least one matchup with a national power' and (2) three games against teams of their level that they can use to extend their season; (3) a big payday.

    It might not be an idea solution, but it's not a terrible injustice to those teams.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Olympic Fan View Post
    To be fair, the small schools are taken care of. Although a Princeton and Miami won't get to advance to the semifinals, no matter what, they WILL get to play four games. The first/second round patsies from Durham will play each other and will play first/second round patsies from the other sites.

    Some of them will get to host games.

    While they can't win the event, they get (1) at least one matchup with a national power' and (2) three games against teams of their level that they can use to extend their season; (3) a big payday.

    It might not be an idea solution, but it's not a terrible injustice to those teams.
    Why can't events be organized like the tourny last year in the 76 Classic (in California) and Maui? Each team in those tournies, gets THREE GAMES, no matter if they win or lose (losers play losers, winners play winners).

    Sure, less people tend to care about the game for 7th place. But everyone would get 3 games and the non-big teams would generally play at least one good team.

    (In the 76 classic last year, UCLA came in last, and UCLA played Butler in the losers bracket in the second round. Is that a problem?)
    <devildeac> anyone playing drinking games by now?
    7:49:36<Wander> drink every qb run?
    7:49:38<loran16> umm, drink every time asack rushes?
    7:49:38<wolfybeard> @devildeac: drink when Asack runs a keeper
    7:49:39 PM<CB&B> any time zack runs, drink

    Carolina Delenda Est

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Earth
    ^$$$$ for the hosts and the organizers.

    Although it's likely that the Princeton game will be the opener, I would not be surprised to see us play a game on Friday 11/12. K has tended to schedule a lot of games before exams recently. We played Friday, Monday, Tuesday, Saturday to open the season last year. I would not be surprised to see Friday, Sunday, Tuesday, and possibly Thursday before we head to KC on Monday.

  19. #19
    Any truth to rumors circulating regarding a Davidson-Duke matchup @ TWC Arena in Charlotte this year.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Earth
    It would not surprise me. We have usually played a game in Charlotte when they host the NCAAs. 1999, 2002, 2005, 2008 all come to mind.

Similar Threads

  1. Duke Identity 2010/11- Big or Small?
    By Newton_14 in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 278
    Last Post: 11-21-2010, 05:14 PM
  2. Duke-UNC 2010
    By Blueequalslife23 in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 11-21-2009, 10:51 AM
  3. Duke FB vs. Michigan in 2010?
    By blazindw in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 07-29-2009, 04:41 PM
  4. Orlando Magic Pre-Season Opener
    By JBDuke in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 10-24-2007, 09:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •