I got 81-72 tracking the play by play thread

Assuming that play by play is accurate, some interesting +/- by player:

These 3 players had worse +/- than UNC average, a couple way below the average

-22 Henson
-19 Zeller
-15 Strickland

These players were at the -12 team average

-12 Ginyard
-12 Davis
-12 Graves

------------------

These guys were better than the average some by quite a bit:

-8 Watts
-6 D Wear
-4 Thompson
-2 Campbell

-4 Drew II (different than I expected from what I had read above)
+8 McDonald
+ 8 T Wear

It could be that the UNC subs were matched with Vandy subs but only bright side is play of UNC subs, the twins who every one had written off this year.

Except for Deon who scored 16 and was only -4 +/-, the UNC Big man play was particularly disappointing especially since Australian Ogilvy did not play due to a concussion.

Even though Strickland scored 13 his +/- was -15, which sounds bad but is only -3 worse than the average. Same for Zeller who scored 8 but +/- was -19 (-7 worse than average) and Henson who only scored 3 had +/- of -22 (-10 worse than average).

Davis was next highest scorer @ 8 points and was on the UNC average of -12 +/-.

POG for UNC was Travis Wear who scored 6 points and was +8 +/-

Could not tell who the 5th UNC starter was, but he was +5, possibly Graves since other 4 Drew II, Ginyard, Deon and Davis plus Henson were mentioned at first sub.