I say we win the tie since we have 25 FP votes to unc's 20. In fact because of that, I argue that it is a tie at all.
If we got five more votes than UNC, I wonder how low some of these people had us ranked to allow UNC to tie us in the overall voting?
Even with the uneven scheduling we have an experienced team and should be the best team in the conference out of the gate. After that I guess it will depend on how the newcomers to the league, including our own, develop.
Sheesh. Someone ought to examine the ballots of these clowns and revoke their right to participate.
Andre Dawkins: “People ask me if I can still shoot, and I ask them if they can still breathe. That’s kind of the same thing.”
Duke: 25 1st place votes, 15 second place, 8 third place
UNC: 20 1st place votes, 25 second place, 3 third place
I'm just surprised there were people who didn't vote for Singler, Vasquez or Booker to be on the first team...
A) does not believe that his transition to becoming a full time perimeter player will be a smooth one.
B) chose to cast a first team vote for Jon Scheyer and didn't want to put two players from the same school on their All-ACC first team.