Originally Posted by
MarineTwinsDad
While I don't want to sound like I'm trying to justify what I did, I have to say that I do agree the best way around situations like this is not to speed. I'm probably the only driver in Delaware who travels at less than 60 MPH on I-95. What happened in NC was partly because we left Delaware at 4 A.M. to drive down with my other Marine twin son to get his stuff out of storage at New River (Jacksonville) to go to his next assignment (Penn State). My wife and I then drove up to see the twin son at Cherry Point.
Some of you are probably familiar with what it feels like to spend some time with a son who is headed off to the "Sandbox," although he isn't going until October. He's eager to go, and serve. We're of mixed feelings. After leaving Cherry Point, we got on Rt 70, and the speed limit was 70 MPH. I definitely zoned out, focusing on the road, but there was little traffic (and we were passed a few times). I set my cruise control at 78 MPH, which was probably too high - especially when my other son said later that the GPS indicated the car is going a few miles faster than indicated. Nothing on the road changed, no increase in traffic, no residential areas, so I just didn't see any changes in speed. I guess my mind was on other things.
But I am still at fault, and readily agree. If I had seen the signs, I would have been going much slower, and I should have seen the signs. I can understand the law, and do appreciate all of you who have taken the time to give ample warnings about the situation. Three days after the incident I've gotten nine letters from lawyers, and will definitely be hiring someone. Some sound pretty positive they can help.
The really nice thing is that I can go online to this forum, where I've been for a number of years (formerly jeliason on the old Web site), and get great feedback and advice. That, as is said, is priceless. Thanks again.