That was pretty much my point, since it seemed like such an odd list from an academic point of view. Of course, seemingly odd lists are par for the course when you are focused specifically on basketball (or math, football, chess, journalism, electrical engineering, or almost any other specialized activity).
The one quibble I'd have is that plenty of Duke students would have considered one of those schools, especially if they had some personal or geographical connection to the place. I'd also add that there are plenty of students at those schools who'd do fine at Duke; while there's presumably an academic gap between the average Duke student and the average student at, say, Oklahoma, you're kidding yourself if you think that there aren't some students at OU who'd do well and do good things at Duke.
While such assertions needn't really be substantiated, here's a list of the 10 colleges that enrolled the most National Merit Scholars in 2010:[[
http://us.tamu.edu/2010/01/am-ranks-...it-scholars/]]
Harvard (266)
Northwestern (246)
University of Texas at Austin (245)
Yale (234)
University of Southern California (229)
Washington University in St. Louis (223)
University of Chicago (214)
Princeton (196)
University of Oklahoma (196)
Texas A & M (189)
Note that Oklahoma is on the list, and Duke isn't. Obviously, Texas, A&M, OU, and Southern Cal are a lot bigger than Duke, and being a NM Scholar isn't a solid indicator of anything beyond an ability to do well on the SAT and do reasonably well in high school, but it's also true that off the east coast, most of the best students choose to go to public colleges.
Back to Quincy...