Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: "Duke" Article

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Red Lion, PA

    "Duke" Article

    I hope everyone had a great New Year holiday!

    I was perusing the net and came across this article:

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/9...comment_470880

    This article is terrible, and it makes me wonder why people think Duke hasn't changed from last year. Do we have the dominating post presence? IMO, no, but it has been effecive for how we run our offensive sets. I also realize that spelling is not the most important thing, but if you are going to write about a team, how can you mess up the names of guys like Miles PLUMLEE, or OLEK Czyz? This blows my mind....

  2. #2
    I touched on the differences between this year's team and last in this thread.

    The key is rebounding.

  3. #3
    Eh, the author is no Jumbo, but he's no Doyel either. Just another dude with an average level of basketball knowledge trying to get some page hits.

  4. #4
    Haha, there was an article on the Paulus/Nolan situation in SI last week and while I found it highly complementative of Nolan's ability, it ripped GP3 a new one. Calling him slow, a poor defender, and basically a jump shooter trying to play the point. Essentially blaming him for Duke's "shortcomings" the past few years. It even went as far to quote a Xavier player saying the difference between the two is "night and day."

    Look, its clear Nolan has become the better of the two, but making Greg out to be some schmuck Duke pulled off the street pissed me off. Greg is better then that, and deserves the respect of the reporter and that Xavier player Duke just finished stomping by 20.

    Now, I got that out of my system.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by geraldsneighbor View Post
    Haha, there was an article on the Paulus/Nolan situation in SI last week and while I found it highly complementative of Nolan's ability, it ripped GP3 a new one. Calling him slow, a poor defender, and basically a jump shooter trying to play the point. Essentially blaming him for Duke's "shortcomings" the past few years. It even went as far to quote a Xavier player saying the difference between the two is "night and day."

    Look, its clear Nolan has become the better of the two, but making Greg out to be some schmuck Duke pulled off the street pissed me off. Greg is better then that, and deserves the respect of the reporter and that Xavier player Duke just finished stomping by 20.

    Now, I got that out of my system.

    I read the same article and didn't think it was that off base. Maybe the quote from the Xavier player was a little harsh, but it apparently was the player's opinion. To me Greg has shown more ability as a jump shooter than as a point guard for a top 10 team.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    When talking about the "merits" of this team it is very premature to even mention the names Plumlee or Olek let alone spell them correctly. Now EWill that's a diiferent story!

Similar Threads

  1. interesting Forde article on "one and done" athletes
    By Ann Arbor Devil in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-06-2008, 10:59 AM
  2. Icing the Shooter: "Good" play or "Bad"
    By greybeard in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-07-2008, 03:53 PM
  3. "Duke is back, and deeper than ever" - A nice MSNBC article
    By BryanCenterBlues in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-20-2007, 02:41 AM
  4. DBR'S "Where to from here" article
    By devildownunder in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-20-2007, 06:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •