Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 36
  1. #1

    Could Lee Fowler be any more stupid?

    Kay Yow made me an NCSU Women's basketball fan. Lee Fowler just brought that to a crashing halt.

    Glance had 15 years as an assistant. She pretty much ran the program for the last two years. She kept the team emotinally put together in the face of the worst kind of tragedy. Yow herself said she wanted Glance to have the job.

    Yow knew more about women's basketball than Fowler will ever hope to know. If Yow thought Glance was ready it seems a little presumptous for Fowler to think he knows better. But now we know just what Fowler actually thought of Kay Yow.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by allenmurray View Post
    If Yow thought Glance was ready it seems a little presumptous for Fowler to think he knows better.
    Isn't that his job?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Atlanta, GA/Durham, NC
    So who got hired? Sorry, I really have no idea what goes on in Raleigh.

  4. #4
    Nothing that Lee Fowler does, no matter how dumb, surprises me. Maybe he's jealous of Debbie Yow's success at Maryland? ;-) I'm not a fan of hers but certainly was of Kay's (two very different women).

    My impression is that he is not a positive, constructive leader and he could not give a hoot about the constituencies of any of the Wolfpack teams. Guess he just relies on their fans' innate "rabidness" for all things lupine and expects support.

    There have been several notable stumbles on his watch and I have wondered how he keeps his job.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Considering all major universities with successful, sporting heritage, Fowler may be the worst athletic director in the country.

    NCSU Men's basketball, once nationally prominent, has become impotent due to his decisions over the past 15 years.

    Only two wolfpack teams played in the post-season this year.

    It all starts at the top. Chancellor Oblinger needs to take an interest in the schools athletics (not just academia), and fire the bum.

  6. #6

    WCU

    Sounds like Western Carolina should be talking to Stephanie Glance.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Mebane, NC
    Quote Originally Posted by NCSU&UNCgrad View Post
    Considering all major universities with successful, sporting heritage, Fowler may be the worst athletic director in the country.

    NCSU Men's basketball, once nationally prominent, has become impotent due to his decisions over the past 15 years.

    Only two wolfpack teams played in the post-season this year.

    It all starts at the top. Chancellor Oblinger needs to take an interest in the schools athletics (not just academia), and fire the bum.

    Hey now, I wouldn't say that.

    Fowler hired a football coach in Tom O'Brian, and that is looking very good.
    The Wolfpack football team is expecting a 9-3, maybe 10-2 season this year.

    And I do believe football is the most important sport to NCSU, not basketball.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Cary, NC
    just to play devil's advocate... Bill Cowher left the Steelers a couple of years ago and everyone presumed it would be one of two assistants that got the nod to be promoted from within. The Rooney's went with an outsider that people panned at first and thought they were asanine for not promoting from within. Seems to me that turned out a-ok
    Duke '96
    Cary, NC

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Steamboat Springs, CO

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by NCSU&UNCgrad View Post
    Considering all major universities with successful, sporting heritage, Fowler may be the worst athletic director in the country.

    NCSU Men's basketball, once nationally prominent, has become impotent due to his decisions over the past 15 years.

    Only two wolfpack teams played in the post-season this year.

    It all starts at the top. Chancellor Oblinger needs to take an interest in the schools athletics (not just academia), and fire the bum.
    I think the decision to hire an outside coach for women's hoops reflects a decision that the State women's program, despite the pioneering efforts of Kay Yow, is a middle-of-the-road program that was not winning much of anything. Did you want Fowler to hire a coach he thought would be mediocre?

    sagegrouse

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Maybe Kellie Harper will take WBB at State to new heights...who knows? Maybe Stephanie Glance could have righted this emotionally shaky ship and led the ladies to an improved record next season...who knows? But we'll never know now that she's been unceremoniously dumped in spite of having giving it her all for the past 15 or so years, the last couple of them being under especially trying circumstances. As far as recruiting goes, I've got to think that regardless of a coach's recruiting skills, perhaps?surely? some higher-rated high school girls chose not to go to a school (State) where the head coach, legendary as she was, was in a very precarious health situation. Again, who knows? And as for offering Glance another job in the ath. dept., the time to do that was when she was told she wouldn't be hired as head coach, not now as an afterthought. It's not as if she did a lousy job as head coach; she was never given the chance to be the head coach. As I see it, there's a big difference between being "interim" HC and "the" HC. To put it mildly, I think this dismissal was poorly handled. Best of everything to Stephanie Glance and a pox on Lee Fowler!
    Last edited by Raleighfan; 04-16-2009 at 01:33 PM.

  11. #11
    I don't understand the angst over the State decision to go outside for a new coach. Years of service as an assistant to a coach who died after gallantly fighting a dread disease does not, IMO, create an entitlement to succeed as the head coach. State showed tremendous loyalty to Kay Yow through her struggle. I am sure there were detrimental aspects for State.

    The level of success of the State program over the past few years has not been particularly outstanding. A desire to move on and change direction makes eminently good sense to me. Sentimentality is not a rational basis to make a coaching choice.

    What has been will not always be, nor should it.

  12. #12
    ^^^^Isn't that a Led Zepplin song?

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Indoor66 View Post
    I don't understand the angst over the State decision to go outside for a new coach. Years of service as an assistant to a coach who died after gallantly fighting a dread disease does not, IMO, create an entitlement to succeed as the head coach. State showed tremendous loyalty to Kay Yow through her struggle. I am sure there were detrimental aspects for State.

    The level of success of the State program over the past few years has not been particularly outstanding. A desire to move on and change direction makes eminently good sense to me. Sentimentality is not a rational basis to make a coaching choice.
    Do you really think that Fowler knows more about women's basketball in general, the needs of this particular group of women, or the needs of the incoming class than Kay Yow did? I think her opinion that Glance was ready and a good candidate should have meant something.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by allenmurray View Post
    Do you really think that Fowler knows more about women's basketball in general, the needs of this particular group of women, or the needs of the incoming class than Kay Yow did? I think her opinion that Glance was ready and a good candidate should have meant something.
    IMO the converse of your argument is equally plausible. The decision on a head coach is a long term decision, not an act of fealty to a deceased coach. As to who knows or knew more about women's basketball, I don't have the answer and I doubt that you do either. Further, I am not sure it is the primary question when dealing with personnel questions.

  15. #15
    I have mixed opinions on this topic. On the one hand, I think that Lee Fowler would have done better to choose the person that the Hall of Fame coach had every confidence in the world could competently run the basketball program moving forward. It would have done a great deal for recruits to say that this coach was the hand-picked successor of one of the greats of women's college basketball.

    On the other hand, I see the administration's argument at the beginning that having an open, national search might do more in the eyes of a recruit to say that they picked the best candidate that they could find out of the large number who applied.

    I think it's unfair to characterize NC State as a "middle of the road" program, as some have done here. Coach Yow had issues with recruiting during her final years, very likely due to health constrictions on her part and concerns on the part of recruits that they would have to deal with the loss of their coach part-way through their college career, which would out-weigh the benefit of playing on the team.

    We'll see how things go now that they have a new coach who is healthy, young, and enthusiastic. While I think that State probably could have done at least a little bit better at least on paper, I won't begrudge them the choice until the coach is given the chance and doesn't do well. Who knows, maybe she presented a very comprehensive vision for the way that she wants the program to go and she had the whole package in their private interviews that we haven't heard about. Time will tell. All I know is that I won't be cheering as much for NC State as I would be if they'd hired Glance.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Steamboat Springs, CO

    Smile A heated debate on State WBB -- is this what we need on DBR?

    Quote Originally Posted by allenmurray View Post
    Do you really think that Fowler knows more about women's basketball in general, the needs of this particular group of women, or the needs of the incoming class than Kay Yow did? I think her opinion that Glance was ready and a good candidate should have meant something.
    Everything you mention is temporal and not a serious long-term consideration. I am prepared to believe that Fowler made a lousy decision -- that's his track record. But if he felt that the State WBB program needed some changes and improvements, not only is that his prerogative as AD, it seems to me that he is right.

    And BTW Kay Yow's opinion about Glance probably did mean something; it just wasn't determinative.

    sagegrouse

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by MHTorringjan View Post
    I have mixed opinions on this topic. On the one hand, I think that Lee Fowler would have done better to choose the person that the Hall of Fame coach had every confidence in the world could competently run the basketball program moving forward. It would have done a great deal for recruits to say that this coach was the hand-picked successor of one of the greats of women's college basketball.
    Well Bob Knight hand picked Pat Knight to succeed him at Texas Tech, how is that working out for them? Let the AD do his job.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    New Orleans, Louisiana
    NC State hired Kellie Harper of Western Carolina. The all-important link:

    http://sports.espn.go.com/ncw/news/story?id=4074818

    Harper compiled a 97-65 record while leading the Catamounts to two NCAA tournament bids and a pair of Southern Conference championships. N.C. State gave her a five-year contract with a base salary of $247,000.

    Harper takes over one of the Atlantic Coast Conference's most traditionally successful programs, but one that has slid in recent years while nearby rivals Duke and North Carolina have become powerhouses.
    I know very little of the situation, but this feels like an underwhelming hire, especially for a school that's more or less faded from national recognition.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Deeetroit City
    Quote Originally Posted by allenmurray View Post
    Do you really think that Fowler knows more about women's basketball in general, the needs of this particular group of women, or the needs of the incoming class than Kay Yow did? I think her opinion that Glance was ready and a good candidate should have meant something.
    If this were the men's team in a comparable situation, would you make the statement:

    Do you really think that Fowler knows more about men's basketball in general, the needs of this particular group of men, or the needs of the incoming class than the previous coach did?
    Treating the women's program as different, or women athletes as different or as having different needs would be wrong wouldn't it?

    Perhaps you would have the same concerns about the current athletes on the men's team, but I wonder if your concerns arise because the athletes at issue are women - which I would call gallant, but then I have been called antiquated.

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by BD80 View Post
    If this were the men's team in a comparable situation, would you make the statement:



    Treating the women's program as different, or women athletes as different or as having different needs would be wrong wouldn't it?

    Perhaps you would have the same concerns about the current athletes on the men's team, but I wonder if your concerns arise because the athletes at issue are women - which I would call gallant, but then I have been called antiquated.
    Had a highly successful men's coach, who watched his team be led by an assistant during the most trying of all possible circumstances, stated publicly before his death that he thought that particular assistant coach was the best prepared person to lead the team through what would be an incredibly difficult transition, I would have expected his opinion to have carried a lot of weight as well. I would also assume that any highly successful coach probably knows more about his/her current team than does Lee Fowler.

    Nice try - I am niether sexist nor gallant. I just think Fowler screwed up. Sometimes things are what they are, with no hidden agenda.

    Let's look at it this way, suppose that Coach K had been in a similar situation, he knew he was dying, and he watched Johnny Dawkins pretty much lead the team for two years after having served as chief assistant for 15, and K said, "after my demise I think Dawkins should be head coach". And then the Duke AD went out and hired someone from a different program. Do you think the Duke fans would be entitled to wonder what the heck was going on, and how the AD could be so out of touch?

Similar Threads

  1. Stupid question here
    By DBFAN in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-10-2008, 10:04 PM
  2. Ryan Fowler suspended for Steroids
    By TheDuke11 in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-09-2008, 05:53 PM
  3. It's the economy (err.. the defense), stupid...
    By Jumbo in forum Elizabeth King Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 03-09-2007, 01:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •