Originally Posted by
COYS
He also is far too harsh on D'Antoni's time with the Suns, too, in my opinion. Two years ago, an unlikely suspension may very easily have cost the Suns a finals appearance (I strongly belief this). One season out of those four was played without Amare and they still made it deep into the postseason. Yes, I think it's a legitimate argument that the Suns' style made it harder for the team to adjust to a change of pace or even the loss of important players (as in 2007), but, in my opinion it's not a definitive truth about his system. I actually do agree that Nash probably should not have won two MVP's, but D'Antoni's system is not all smoke and mirrors. His Suns teams were a few lucky bounces away from being one of the most entertaining teams in years to win a title, or at least get a shot at winning a title in the finals. Plus, there's something to be said to finding the players to run your system and exploiting your team's strengths. I mean, would the Suns have had a better chance at winning the title if they had played a slow pace with "ace" defenders like Nash and Amare trying to grind it out?