No! I am not against recruiting Harrison Barnes and Brandon Knight. In fact, those are the type of players we should be pursuing. Brandon Knight is an exceptional student at an elite private high school and Harrison Barnes comes from a family that stresses academics first. They are both Top 5 recruits who will most likely leave college early and earn millions in the NBA. My point is that while they are in college they will be student-athletes serious about their course load. I expect both will eventually earn a degree either during summer sessions or after their NBA careers are over.
Bob Green
Count me among those who are disappointed that we didn't land Wall and/or Bledsoe. I wish them no ill will but do not want to see Kentucky do well. At this point, I'm ready to move on and focus on the guys we got.
I see this as (potentially) our best team since the JJ/Sheldon team (despite the loss of Henderson).
I like what the two incoming freshman bring to the table (especially Plumlee who I think adds a lot of athleticism on both ends of the floor).
I think Singler is a first team All-American.
I see Scheyer as an improved and even more confident player (and he has always been a quality player).
E-mail is a dynamic player and a potential difference maker on both ends of the court.
Smith has tremendous potential. He was playing really high quality basketball down the stretch. I see a much improved player after another summer of work.
We have a lot of depth at the big man position for the first time in a long time.
We have a hungry team, coaching staff, and fan base.
Let's not sell this team short.
I agree that the NBA high school entry rule needs to be changed.
I agree with this. The problem I have is that it's completely a matter of perception when it comes to approval of recruiting players like this. Some one and dones are okay, while some are not. Brandon Knight is a one and done, but no one has any problem going after him because he gets good grades at a good school. He's at one extreme. John Wall's grades might have been a red flag, but if he had a 3.2 GPA, would that have changed people's minds? 3.6? Where is the cut-off? If he has a nice smile and friendly, outgoing attitude, will the cut-off be lower? It's possible that one player with a 2.8 GPA would participate in class at Duke and add to the academic experience, while another with a 4.0 in high school would sleep in the back, but because he was naturally more intelligent, pass all his classes. It's actually impossible for an outsider that has never spoken with a recruit to know what kind of student-athlete he will be. Luckily, we pay coaches and administrators to do this and make those decisions for us. So far, I have no reason to doubt their ability to make good decisions.
Edit: The most ironic thing about the John Wall recruitment, to me, was the fact that Clifton, his "handler" (!!!) actually pushed for him to attend Duke.
Good luck to Mr. Wall The article on the front page is very insightful. Duke basketball will be fine. Who's to say our Nolan Smith doesn't step up big time! I sure hope so. I like him a heck of alot better than some unknown highly touted recruit. That's it. Anything further about our recruitment for 09 would probably be pointless, imo.
Aren't we done beating this dead horse yet?
can a recruit fill a roster spot K needs and contribute to the team, help it win, within the time frame the kid is likely to be around? if yes, then
Is the recruit a very solid student?
If the answer to both is yes, then we have a pretty good chance, and the kid would have a good chance of flourishing in his time at Duke, and going on and having a successful life, including, possibly, coming back and graduating from Duke. Think Luol Deng.
Brandon Knight, the answer to both questions is yes. He is probably good enough to play a lot as a freshman, so even if he stays one year, he has helped the program and Duke win. He is a very solid student.
John Wall, with all due respect, is not the same caliber of student, and, therefore, the answer to the second part of the question is no.
The N&O's Caulton Tudor has an article addressing the possible impact of Wall going elsewhere on all of the triangle schools, not just Duke. Not sure why he's written it in the Charlotte Observer, but it's his take on the situation. Nothing new, just another opinion.
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/col...ry/734254.html
Q "Why do you like Duke, you didn't even go there." A "Because my art school didn't have a basketball team."
That's an interesting article about Wall, but I wouldn't make too much about the fact that Kentucky was able to get a big recruit out of the triangle. Because of Wall's particular situation, he got very little interest from UNC and only late interest from Duke, so that won't repeat itself very often.
At this point in time, the Duke admin. seems to be very lenient, hands-on, yes, but very lenient with respect to Football and Basketball admissions. It is to the point that recruiting a player who sweeps up the bottom of the permissible range can often be an exercise in frustration. Marginal students typically do not enjoy the Duke experience (talk with Chris Kennedy), and generally are not as interested in attending Duke in the first place. Yes, you can get a marginal student through Duke or keep them eligible, with a lot of hand-holding, tutoring, monitoring. Recruiting within the allowable range (really broad at this point) without prioritizing the smarter kids who meet the basketball roster needs criteria actually lower yields. Football learned that lesson in the 09 class, where they lost several top recruits (top 30 ranked in their positions) supposedly interested in Duke, had Duke on the final list up to signing day, but who chose other less academically rigorous schools. They had 950 SATs the admissions office was willing to accept. This year, in Football, Cut is looking more at who is the best academic-football fit, rather than just who he can get in and then the best position fit. And, he is getting top recruits as a result. Olaniyan, Snead are excellent students. The results, yield, of higher ranked players looks promising.
One and dones which fit the roster needs and who are good students - think also Corey Maggette - high SATs.
Doesn't seem very likely Wall would actually stay three years, but still...
http://www.kentucky.com/818/story/802751.html
Bledsoe... whyyyy....
The Latest UK Rumor: John Wall to Greece?
http://www.allkyhoops.com/2009/06/la...to-greece.html
Wall will get qualified.
The comments on that site though, are quite amusing. The UK fan base is pretty darn divided on the win-at-all-costs attitude of Mr. Calipari.
--Jason "Wall to Greece... I wonder if Brandon Jennings draft position this year will affect that" Evans
Why are you wasting time here when you could be wasting it by listening to the latest episode of the DBR Podcast?
Just be you. You is enough. - K, 4/5/10, 0:13.8 to play, 60-59 Duke.
You're all jealous hypocrites. - Titus on Laettner
You see those guys? Animals. They're animals. - SIU Coach Chris Lowery, on Duke
I'm reading that it's also not clear whether Eric Bledsoe has qualified academically yet to play as a freshman at UK. Imagine neither Wall nor Bledsoe playing for UK next year.
Last edited by JBDuke; 06-03-2009 at 08:22 AM. Reason: removed redacted post quote