I've heard Georgia Tech and Arizona referred to as "Point Guard U" much more often than Duke.
I think that G's greatest strength is probably his ability to create for himself. That's certainly what saved us in the Belmont game.
I don't see how you think that Duke's versatility means that we don't need a point guard. I don't see how you can even think that we're insanely versitile if our point guard is better suited as a shooting guard and our small forward can't create for himself.
Everything that you say is somewhat obvious, yet I get the feeling that you think it's really profound, i.e. Kyle can create offense by passing, Nolan's defensive prowess makes him capable, players that do not play the point guard position can set up a "scoring play", EWill came in with "high regards".
Yeah, we're not a team where the shooting guard stands at the three point line waiting for the ball, while the center stands at the low block waiting for the ball. We've long had versatile players at Duke, though, so I'm not sure why another versatile team means that we can just chuck the idea of having a point guard.