Numbers dorks are so cute. Really, smart guys rule!
The term dorks more often connotes only average intelligence combined with a lack of social grace, etc. Nerds and geeks on the other hand...
Wow, YBT, that was a dorky statement...
The one's digit in (2^x)-1 can be 1, 3, 5, or 7 (but never 9):
not a good proof (actually not a proof at all), but I think that's a pretty clear explanation.My explanation:
2^1 = 2 --> (2^x)-1 ends in 1 if (x mod 4) is 1
2^2 = 4 --> (2^x)-1 ends in 3 if (x mod 4) is 2
2^3 = 8 --> (2^x)-1 ends in 7 if (x mod 4) is 3
2^4 = 16 --> (2^x)-1 ends in 5 if (x mod 4) is 0
2^5 = 32
2^6 = 64
... (the least significant digit will always cycle 2-4-8-6)
2^43112609 --> (43112609 mod 4) is 1, therefore the number ends in 2 (and number-1 ends in 1)
Thanks for sharing Hurley. Really neat stuff. Are there any notorious equations out there still unsolved? How about one only solved by its creator?
Among "easy" conjectures, that is, those which require knowing only basic arithmetic and geometry to understand, I think we still have the Goldbach conjecture, the twin prime conjecture, whether there are infinitely many perfect numbers, the 196 problem and the 3x + 1 problem. There aren't a whole lot of simply-stated ones left... who gives a crap about whether P = NP.
Pierre de Fermat implied he had a solution to his own Last Theorem, but he probably didn't. The actual proof used systems of mathematics far more advanced than anything around in Fermat's time.