Just a few observations:
-- I think you are wrong if you think this schedule hasn't been crafted with as much care as recent Duke schedules as far as the RPI rating of the team's non-conference ratings. Based on last year's ratings, Duke's non-ACC foes were:
4. UCLA
8. Georgetown
9. Xavier
35. Davidson
45. Purdue
62. Southern Illinois
77. Rhode Island
130. Duquesne
132. Georgia Southern
141. Loyola (Md)
143. UNC Asheville
156. St. John's
173. Michigan
181. Duquesne
229. Montana
Obviously, these are going to change this year with graduation losses and additions (Xavier loses Lavender and Burrell in the backcourt; Georgia Southern loses a lot; Purdue, St. John's and Michigan all expect to be a lot better), but what's beautiful is that there are no or few BAD teams on it. Counting conference games, Duke will play five games against 2008 top 10 RPI opponents, nine against top 50 (although No. 52 Virginia Tech should move up to give us two more in 2009), 20 against top 100, 27 against top 150 and 30 (of 31) against top 200 -- and Montana at 229 is a lot better than last year's stinker against NCCU ... BTW Montana played just one so-so senior last year and should be the preseason favorite in the Big Sky)
-- Looking at the conference breakdown, I think Duke got a fairly rough ACC schedule. Obviously, preseason projections are not written in stone, but I see:
2 games against the best team in the conference, UNC (no surprise, but the teams that play UNC once ... and Duke once ... are going to be at a big advantage).
6 games (out of a possible eight) against the four teams that are likely to share the first division with No. 1 UNC and No. 2 Duke (in preseason predictions) -- home and home with Virginia Tech and Wake; home against Miami; at Clemson
3 games (out of a possible six) of the three teams expected to finish at the bottom of the league -- single games with NC State and Virginia at home and at Boston College.
-- I was also surprised to see the Georgetown game in Durham, but when you look at the series (since we started playing them almost every year in 2003) you see an odd pattern:
2003 -- Durham
2004 -- Washington
2005 -- no game
2006 -- Washington
2007 (actually Dec. 2006) -- Durham
2008 -- no game
2009 -- Durham
So its home/away/away/home/home ... I assume the next two games in the series will be away/away
-- I think that Purdue is a great opponent -- the best Duke will play outside the league (with the possible exception of UCLA in New York). Great season last year with an extremely young team. Martin, who might have been their top-rated recruit, left because he was squeezed out of the starting lineup. Hummel was a freshman stud, while Moore and Johnson were outstanding. Painter is doing a great job coaching this team -- they are tough, well-disciplined and will be playing at home. I'm not sure they will be preseason top 10, but they'll be close. They'll be one of the favorites in the Big 10 -- ahead of Michigan State? I don't know that -- but even if they are No. 2, Duke's the No. 2 preseason pick in the ACC, so it's a perfect matchup.