houstondukie, here's another way of looking at it: if you were building a team over the next four years, who would you take?
Sophomore Redick, who you know FOR SURE is destined to be the all-time points leader in the ACC (until Hansblah at least)
OR
Junior Scheyer, who MAY improve, MAY stay the same or MAY actually regress (we don't know)
Come on. To me the answer is obvious. Scheyer may end up better than Redick, but that's a big assumption you're taking. (Putting aside that this is one useless academic exercise...but that's what bball fans do in the summer).
That's like saying which stock would you rather take (knowing what you know now): Google before they launched AdWords, or Cuil, who claims they have 3x Google's number of pages indexed but whose future is uncertain. I'd take Google any day of the week, and
twice on Sunday.