Happy 100th Birthday, Ace Parker
Ace Parker article from goduke.com
What a remarkable variety of achievements:
2-time football All-America at Duke
Set numerous school records for rushing yardage and touchdowns
Played 3 sports at Duke and was inducted into College Hall of Fame
Played in the NFL, winning a Player of the Year award and achieving induction into Pro Football Hall of Fame
Played Major League Baseball
World War II veteran
Longtime Duke Baseball coach, twice leading teams to the College World Series
We occasionally have discussions about Duke's greatest athlete ever; it may well be Ace Parker.
Plunkett Proved the Opposite
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jim3k
Bud knew the Duke football program well as his son Jay had been an All-American halfback at Duke two years earlier, graduating in 1964. He knew all the football-connected staff and of course was close to Cameron. Had Knight not overruled Cameron in favor of Harp, Wilkinson would probably have accepted. What he didn't know was that Knight and others had a different vision of the future.
As for Harp, he probably did possess the X's and O's necessary to be a successful coach. We'll never know for sure, but he thought a Cornell type of approach to recruiting was fine. As a result, the entire football program was essentially destroyed by an administration which did not want big-time football. Knight seemed to think the Ivy model was a good one to follow. I also believe he really was convinced that the University of Chicago had done the right thing by abandoning football altogether. The general idea was that a great research/academic university and football scholarships were incompatible. He couldn't walk away from the ACC, however, so football had to stay. But he cobbled together a policy limiting salaries, recruitment, scheduling and resisting any redshirting. The pendulum began to swing back under Mike McGee, but he wasn't given the support he needed and was unnecessarily fired. The following years devolved into 40+ years of mediocrity. Not until Cut arrived was any serious consideration given to modifying the policy. I think Mike Krzyzewski was able to get the ear first of Nan and later of Dick, leading to a more realistic approach to football. But within the university there has always been an influential anti-football cadre.
The thinking at the time was that big-time football and first-rate academics were incompatible. This was the supposed lesson derived by the deemphasis of football that happened in the early '50s with the Ivy League. No, that's just how the Ivy League decided to approach the issue of college athletics. Then, Jim Plunkett arrived at Stanford about the same time Duke backed off of football, and -- mirabile dictu -- Stanford went to the Rose Bowl two years in a row. Gee, maybe a strong academic school can be competitive on the field.
I thought then and think now that Knight and the Board of Trustees were wrong. Moreover, I find the contradictions and hypocrisy in Ivy League athletics to be worse than anything that goes on at Duke.
sagegrouse