Duke Recruiting: Embracing Calipari?
Tonight, I'm watching the McDonald's All-American game. This year is unique in that some of the top players are still undecided. Duke, of course, is still "in the mix" with three of the players (SF Shabazz Muhammed, PC/C Tony Parker, and F Amile Jefferson). Given the changes in the roster, it is not out of the realm of possibility that Duke could add two of these players to their incoming class of G Rasheed Sulaimon (playing in the McD's game), C Marshall Plumlee (a McD's AA from last year), and Alex Murphy. I consider the last two part of the recruiting class as they will be freshmen next year.
For the past decade, more or less, John Calipari has seemingly based his ascent at Memphis and then Kentucky by recruiting many of the top players appearing in this annual spectacle of dunks, "oohs," and "aahs." The list of players joining Calipari at Memphis and now Kentucky is enough to make you blush. The general strategy is outlined by Chuck Klosterman in this article from Grantland. Klosterman wonders if Duke and a handful of other powerhouses will adopt the Calipari approach and dominate college basketball, thereby destroying the purity of the game. I more or less agree with Klosterman on nearly every point he makes (I even find it hard to dislike Calipari, even though I hope Kentucky doesn't win this weekend).
But I do disagree with Klosterman on one point. Duke has already adopted the Calipari approach to recruiting. Every year, Duke brings in several McDonald's All-Americans., which is not new. In the past, (the class with Scheyer, Henderson, and Lance Thomas comes to mind) we were targeting top talent, but not necessarily the top talent. These were guys that were highly regarded, but maybe not the top 5 players with a few exceptions (Luol Deng and Shaun Livingston come to mind). Lately, we've been targeting those top players: Kyrie Irving and Austin Rivers have already worn a Duke Jersey for one year. Will Shabbazz Muhammed, Jabari Parker, Julius Randle, Theo Pinson, Jaquel Richmond, Tyus Jones, and Jahlil Okafor join them?
Seriously, the influx of talent that might play for the Blue Devils over the next two-to-three years would be stunning. If Duke were to get most of these players, it would completely reshape the way other recruits from future years think about Duke. Perhaps that is the point. In this new landscape where a team of underclassmen can ascend to the top of the college basketball world, it seems Duke - which has not had a problem attracting top players (although the recent stretch of big man misses is highly discussed on these board) - is trying to compete with Calipari by bringing in these players that are almost assuredly going to leave for the NBA after one or two years.
This is like an open jump shot with time on the clock with a lead at the end of the game: if it goes in, great. if not, have a seat on the bench. If we can get these players, Duke will be in great shape. Even if we get half of them and some second-tier type players, we could be in great shape so long as we build a more complete team. But what if we don't get these top players? Is the downside our long-term reputation with the top players? If so, I still think we can build great teams every few years (2010 will remain one of my favorite years of basketball for a long time). I just wonder if we will be able to compete every year.
The"Duke" Way v the "Kentucky" Way
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miramar
Maggette and Deng surprised people by leaving so quickly, so they weren't recruited as one and dones. With Irving and Rivers it was different because everyone understood that the possibility was there, but that's a long way from setting up a collegiate NBA development league. I don't criticize Cal since it probably fits in well at Kentucky, but that would be awful at Duke. Or it may be better to say that would not be Duke at all.
I agree with most of what you say, but have a couple of different impressions.
First, my recollection was that Kyrie Irving was assumed originally to be a 2-3 year Dukie. I recall that he was coming in with enough advanced placement credits that, with summer school, he could graduate in 2 years or so. He developed much more quickly than expected, and well, you know the rest.
Second, looking at Duke recruits and what K has said, it is clear we look for a certain type of person and have backed off some as a result (Kris Humphries comes to mind).
Not to say that our way is the best way, but it is a way that I, as a fan, have come to enjoy. Our track record has been amazing considering this standard. If we continue to be successful, it is good for all concerned, especially our players who hopefully learn more than basketball under Coach K.
Kentucky has adopted the Tarkanian style - get great players who want to prepare for an NBA career and get them to play together. Calipari is good at what he does. Getting this year's team to play the defense they have shown is remarkable. Will their presumed success signal the demise of college basketball? No, not anymore than it has since the one and done age began.
I don't regret players leaving after a year to pursue their dream if they are ready for it. Many have said in the past that they would leave college early for a lot less than a multimillion dollar career in their chosen field.
But I like our way of developing players as people, of building a program. It can be frustrating at times when our program doesn't click the way we want it to, but it is ours. My only hope is that Coach K has figured out the most important part of a program's success: who will sustain it after the CEO retires.
Haven't they been caught before?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
gocanes0506
The reason most coaches have not embraced this type of recruiting is because its draws a lot of attention. This is a reason Calipari gets the top recruits. He has been busted twice already. I do not expect him to be busted at Kentucky until after he leaves because UK has the pull and money to keep the NCAA off their back. Then again maybe UK has enough money there to back door the recruiting rules so that Calipari or UK doesnt get caught. Who knows.
I humbly recall a couple probations.
Thankfully, Duke seems to care about its reputation, both in developing STUDENT athletes and its position in the broader context.
So, should we start a John Smith, Trinity 1913, board?